Launching at $5 per report. Free while in beta — limited invites.
Every report opens with a page-1 briefing card you can screenshot and act on. Then twelve sections of analysis. Then three appendix sections with every Reddit, HN, and web source we used, summarized inline with direct links. Every claim in the prose is sourced to a specific item.
Verdict, composite, the one thing that matters, plus three short lists: what to know, what to do, what to test. Screenshot-able. Actionable in 60 seconds.
Named competitors, regulatory codes, niche subreddits, and people the report identified — tagged and ready to follow up on.
Verdict and reasoning, up front. Names the specific move that would change the verdict.
Every shipped competitor we can find — pricing, traction signals, where they're weak.
Quote cards from the highest-signal Reddit, HN, and web sources. Real usernames, real dates, linked.
2-3 fleshed-out personas: workflow today, what they pay for now, willingness to pay you.
What the market will actually pay, with comparable products and revenue benchmarks.
Realistic MVP timeline by week, with infra and API costs at each stage.
Regulatory friction, store fees, compliance creep — anything that doesn't show up until launch day.
Real channels with realistic CAC. Not "post on Twitter." First-week tactics, by name.
5-8 specific ways this dies, in order of likelihood, with mitigations.
If the main idea fails, 2-3 pivots that reuse the work and reach better markets.
Six axes scored 1-10. Composite verdict. The numbers behind the red/yellow/green.
Up to 30 references each from Reddit, Hacker News, and the web — every one summarized in 1-2 sentences with a direct link. The receipts behind every claim above.
Real report on the pitch "an AI dashboard and agent system for real estate agents in Dubai that automates the full sales pipeline." Verdict: RED. The briefing card distilled the killer constraint — 14 competitor signals on a free or near-free floor, willingness-to-pay scoring 1.0/10. Every claim sourced.
Most ideas come back yellow because most markets are crowded. We don't cherry-pick a clean green to show off — when one earns it, we'll swap it in. Until then, here are two real yellows the pipeline produced this week, across very different domains.
Genuine paying segment (hospice procurement, Medicare DME), but already crowded with named incumbents (Arjo FloJac, SonderCare, Immersus Airmersus). The briefing card flags FDA Class II clearance as the dominant constraint everything else flows from.
Read the full report →Real paying segment (20-50 person SaaS preparing first audits, $499/mo target), but Drata, Vanta, Secureframe already dominate with comparable auto-collection from AWS/GitHub/Linear. The wedge has to be sharper than "we do it too" — the briefing card spells out exactly which incumbent to differentiate against and how.
Read the full report →We're running a small beta to tune the pipeline before opening the gates. Hit the button below — you'll get instant access, type your one-sentence idea, and we'll send the report a paying customer would get. Self-serve checkout follows once the report quality is locked in.
No subscription, no account, no upsell ladder. Reply to your delivery email with feedback — that's the only ask.
You shouldn't take it on faith. Every claim in the report links to a source. If our reasoning is wrong, the evidence is right there for you to disagree with.
You can. ChatGPT will tell you almost every idea is "promising" and confidently fabricate market sizing. Our reports cite real Reddit threads from this month, with usernames and timestamps. The difference is verifiability.
Reply to the delivery email and tell us. During the beta, feedback drives the prompt tuning — we read every reply and ship fixes within days. At launch, the same reply gets you a free re-run on a refined version of the pitch.
Built by Viksit. The research and writing run on an automated pipeline — Reddit/HN/web scraping, LLM scoring, evidence summarization, then Sonnet drafts + a critic-revise loop on the weakest sections. I read every report before it goes out and feed corrections back into the prompts. The system improves with every customer.
Yes, but with caveats noted up front. We won't give regulatory advice. We will tell you who's already operating in the space and what the typical path-to-launch looks like.
Those are subscription tools you query yourself — you do the work and trust their AI. Here: I do the work, my pipeline produces a one-page briefing card + 15-section narrative with every claim sourced inline, then I read it before sending.